The hearing before the Growth Management Hearing Board on Bainbridge’s SMP will be help at City Hall on Tuesday 24th at 10:00.
The petitioners, Preserve Responsible Shoreline Management, are asking the GMHB to invalidate Bainbridge’s SMP.
See the BI SMP Petitioners’ Reply Brief for summary of the arguments.
THIS SMP IS SERIOUSLY FLAWED, CONFUSING, CONTRADICTORY AND VAGUE
- The Claim that the Phrase “Existing Development” is Code for “Nonconforming” is Contrary to Rules of Construction and is Confusing at Best
- City Approval for Every Human Activity is Overbroad, Vague and Inconsistent with the Priority and Exemption from Permits recognized in the SMA
- Vague Provisions of the SMP are not Sufficient in Scope and Detail.
- The Scope of Policies for Shorelines of Statewide Significance (SSWS) is Now Even More Confusing
- The Scope of Critical Areas is Confusing
THE SMP IS THE RESULT OF SERIOUS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FAILURES
- The City’s Provision of Notice and Information was Flawed fusing Best.
- The City Failed to Provide Meaningful Response to Public Comment
- The City Ignored Conflicting Scientific Information
THIS SMP IS SERIOUSLY FLAWED
- The SMP Violates the Priority and Permit Exemption for Single Family Residential Uses
- The Vegetation Standards Impermissibly Apply to Existing Residential Uses
- This SMP Includes Improper Shoreline Designations.
- The Board has Jurisdiction to Review the SMP for Consistency and the SMP as it Now Stands is Inconsistent.
Copies of all the case documents can be found at http://prsm-bi.org